From: In vitro methodologies to evaluate nanocarriers for cancer treatment: where are we?
Technique | Applicability in 2D | Applicability in 3D | Detection method | Ref |
---|---|---|---|---|
MTT | No limitation; Gold standard method; Well-established and widely used; Notes: Formazan solubility: insoluble (requires solubilization); Can involve mechanisms beyond mitochondrial activity, leading to overestimated results; Lipidic compounds and surfactants may interact with formazan, causing over- or underestimation of cell viability. | Very limited: Penetration issues; Optimization: Low penetration impacts results in dense 3D structures; As alternative, use soluble tetrazolium-based assays (e.g., WST-1, WST-8). | Spectrophotometry | Angius and Floris 2015; Stepanenko and Dmitrenko (2015); Adan et al. (2016); Carvalho et al. (2017); Ghasemi et al. (2021) |
MTS | No limitation; Notes: Formazan solubility: soluble; Can be reduced by non-mitochondrial pathways. | Limited: Diffusion in 3D is better than MTT but may underestimate inner regions; Optimization: Increases incubation time or fragment structure; Pre-select 3D structures based on size and shape to reduce variability. | Spectrophotometry | |
WST-1/WST-8 | No limitation; Notes: Formazan solubility: highly soluble; Can be reduced by non-mitochondrial pathways. | Limited: Better diffusion and reactivity than MTS; Optimization: Increases reaction time or fragment highly dense structure; Pre-select 3D structures based on size and shape to reduce variability. | Spectrophotometry | Riss et al. (2013); Oner et al. (2023); Khalef et al. (2024) |
Resazurin | No limitation; Notes: Little to no interaction with NPs; Reproducibility depends on resazurin concentration and incubation time. | Limited: Better diffusion than formazan-based reagents, but may still require optimization; Optimization: Extend incubation time or fragment highly dense structures; Pre-select 3D structures based on size and shape to reduce variability. | Spectrophotometry or fluorescence | Bonnier et al. (2015); Adan et al. (2016); Gong et al. (2020) |
ATP levels | No imitation; Quick and easy method; Does not rely on reagent penetration but on cell lysis. | Limited: Depends on homogeneous lysis of the 3D structure; Variability may arise in large or dense spheroids if lysis is incomplete; Optimization: Adjust lysis protocol for 3D models; Use detergent-based lysis buffers designed for 3D models; Extend incubation time to ensure ATP extraction; Pre-select 3D structures based on size and shape to reduce variability. | Luminometry | |
SRB | No limitation; Suitable for long-term studies; High sensitivity; Can also evaluate cell proliferation; Note: Cannot differentiate between live and dead cells. | Limited: depends on homogeneous lysis of the structure; Optimization: Adjust lysis protocol; Pre-select 3D structures based on size and shape to reduce variability; Use complementary viability assays to confirm results. | Spectrophotometry | |
Neutral Red | No limitation; Simple and sensitive method; Notes: Not suitable for long-term studies; Interference with silver NPs. | Limited: depends on homogeneous lysis of the structure; Optimization: Adjust lysis protocol; Pre-select 3D structures based on size and shape to minimize variability; Use complementary viability assays to confirm results. | Spectrophotometry | Repetto et al. (2008); Perez et al. (2017); Mello et al. (2020) |
LDH | No limitation; Notes: Results may be altered by culture conditions (e.g., growth/death rates, background LDH release in controls); Cooper-based compounds may hinder LDH detection. | Limited: requires uniform collection of culture medium; Optimization: Strict volume control and thorough mixing of medium before sampling; Pre-select 3D structures based on size and shape to minimize variability; Use complementary viability assays to confirm results. | Spectrophotometry, fluorescence or luminometry | |
Live/Dead Assay | No limitation; Quick and easy method; Provides visual results to support quantitative methods; Note: Propidium iodide may enter viable cells via NP endocytosis, producing false positives. | Limited: allows in-depth analysis with confocal microscopy but may underestimate inner regions; Optimization: Increase reaction time; Adjust reagent concentration; Pre-select 3D structures based on size and shape to reduce variability; Use confocal microscopy with Z-stack imaging to assess inner layers. | Fluorescence or confocal microscopy | Kong et al. (2011); Dominijanni et al. (2021); Khalef et al. (2024) |
Trypan Blue/Erytrosine B | No limitation; Note: Automated analysis is recommended to reduce errors compared to manual readings. | Limited: 3D structure requires lysis prior to analysis; Optimization: Adjust lysis protocol to ensure viable cells post-dissociation; Pre-select 3D structures based on size and shape to reduce variability; Use complementary viability assays to confirm results. | Optical microscopy |